<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: do you need a web 2.0 website make-over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bethdunn.org/2008/04/01/do-you-need-a-web-20-website-make-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bethdunn.org/2008/04/01/do-you-need-a-web-20-website-make-over/</link>
	<description>Inbound Marketing for Creative Small Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:21:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Overmyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bethdunn.org/2008/04/01/do-you-need-a-web-20-website-make-over/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Overmyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smalldots.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-186</guid>
		<description>rjleaman&#039;s got it right, of course.

Successful websites are always all about the user - serving him, entertaining him, or enabling him. This is no less true for nonprofit websites.

In the few freelance web consultancies I do, I&#039;ve always made darned sure that the company&#039;s website connects their mission with the user in an intimate way. It&#039;s what needs to happen with every website that intends to have any impact on their viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rjleaman&#8217;s got it right, of course.</p>
<p>Successful websites are always all about the user &#8211; serving him, entertaining him, or enabling him. This is no less true for nonprofit websites.</p>
<p>In the few freelance web consultancies I do, I&#8217;ve always made darned sure that the company&#8217;s website connects their mission with the user in an intimate way. It&#8217;s what needs to happen with every website that intends to have any impact on their viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjleaman</title>
		<link>http://www.bethdunn.org/2008/04/01/do-you-need-a-web-20-website-make-over/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>rjleaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smalldots.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-185</guid>
		<description>A wholesale site redesign can be both intimidating and expensive for a nonprofit to contemplate - especially a small organization with limited resources. I&#039;m so glad you pose this question of whether it&#039;s necessary.  Your example of The Nature Conservancy makes the vital point that Web 2.0 is about multimedia content, yes, but it&#039;s primarily about a user-centred experience. Sometimes getting there can be as simple as stepping back to look at your site from the user&#039;s perspective - is it quick and easy for site visitors to find the information they&#039;re looking for, and to do those things that they need/want to do? Above all, I&#039;d say the biggest bang for an affordable update would come back to text and tone - finding opportunities to use that magic word: &#039;You.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wholesale site redesign can be both intimidating and expensive for a nonprofit to contemplate &#8211; especially a small organization with limited resources. I&#8217;m so glad you pose this question of whether it&#8217;s necessary.  Your example of The Nature Conservancy makes the vital point that Web 2.0 is about multimedia content, yes, but it&#8217;s primarily about a user-centred experience. Sometimes getting there can be as simple as stepping back to look at your site from the user&#8217;s perspective &#8211; is it quick and easy for site visitors to find the information they&#8217;re looking for, and to do those things that they need/want to do? Above all, I&#8217;d say the biggest bang for an affordable update would come back to text and tone &#8211; finding opportunities to use that magic word: &#8216;You.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
